Page 2 of 2

Re: Colorado is looking at putting in female subquotas

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:28 pm
by Brady Davis
liontracker wrote:Logan stood in front of me, only 15 feet away, at a meeting in Alamosa Colorado, and told the whole room that in his opinion, lions should not be hunted...period. I called him on his bogus juvenile lion recruitment numbers he was using and you know what he said? " Well, I am not a mathematician". This was only a few months before the study was started. What can we do? Ever wonder why the Anti's are so successful at getting their way? It is called LAWSUIT. I swear, all we hunters have to do, is sue the State for hiring such a leftwing anti to do such a biased study and fradulently managing OUR wildlife, that WE spent so much time and money "CONSERVING". Hunters write the checks. Without us, Game and Fish would be flipping burgers at McDonalds. All we have to do is get our tail out from between our leggs and use the POWER of our money.

Screw Politically correct all the way to hell! It is just another tool being used by the extreme left. Politically correct my ass....


This is true. Antis get their way because they sue and they love to litigate...Fight fire with fire...I'll happily send a check and join the cause

Re: Colorado is looking at putting in female subquotas

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:45 pm
by Al Vallejo
liontracker wrote:Logan stood in front of me, only 15 feet away, at a meeting in Alamosa Colorado, and told the whole room that in his opinion, lions should not be hunted...period. I called him on his bogus juvenile lion recruitment numbers he was using and you know what he said? " Well, I am not a mathematician". This was only a few months before the study was started. What can we do? Ever wonder why the Anti's are so successful at getting their way? It is called LAWSUIT. I swear, all we hunters have to do, is sue the State for hiring such a leftwing anti to do such a biased study and fradulently managing OUR wildlife, that WE spent so much time and money "CONSERVING". Hunters write the checks. Without us, Game and Fish would be flipping burgers at McDonalds. All we have to do is get our tail out from between our leggs and use the POWER of our money.

Screw Politically correct all the way to hell! It is just another tool being used by the extreme left. Politically correct my ass....


I hear you!

Anyone interseted, send me a pm or email with info and facts and we'll draft a letter that can go to our state reps, Cattleman's Assoc, Outfitter's assoc., Houndman assoc. and anyone else we need to. I know there is a difference of opinion concerning outfitters/guides and recreational houndsmen, but it's time we teamed up to put this in it's right place.

Just as liontracker says, we need to organize and stand up for our sport, we pay the DOW's wages and it's just ridiculous that we allow them to use biased people and info for their research.

If we continue to look the other way or try on an individual basis you can bet that lion hunting will end up just as our bear hunting did.

How would you like to pursue lions without hounds?

They threw us a bone when they allowed us to hunt bear in the fall then eliminating spring season, baiting and hounds.

So I see the writing on the wall. We continue in our same manner and we will be allowed to hunt lion in future years, just not with hounds.

Is this on the agenda for the next commission meeting? If so what are the times & dates?

Jed you seem to be on board, are you available to attend the Denver meetings?

Al Vallejo
alvallejo@msn.com

Re: Colorado is looking at putting in female subquotas

Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:39 pm
by liondog970
lets get something going, I'm not scarred to spend a little money. This is my lively hood it will be worth every penny! I will contact a few friends and see what we can get done.

Re: Colorado is looking at putting in female subquotas

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:39 pm
by liontracker
Me too... I'm tired of waiting.