Re: A bobcat hunting book
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 8:47 am
Our Foxhound Roots
I don’t pretend to know the exact history of the animal we call man’s best friend. But I do know there are some wild canines that can cross breed with the domestic dog. So let’s say that man took wild canines and began to selectively breed them to make them more useful and better companions. It is known that if the most docile and friendly foxes at a fox farm are selected from litters and bred to each other, it is only a couple generations before their ears start to droop. So it is not a hard job for the imagination to do the same with the wolf or other wild canine.
Consider the Wolf in the far North. They follow herds. They stay on the fringes and watch for stragglers. They stalk and hold their head and tail low. They sprint with great speed. They will split up and work strategies together at times. They will work to get in front of their game because that is less work and more effective than chasing them at times. They work silently for the most part. They use eyes, ears and nose in finding and controlling their game. They are known to be extremely intelligent.
Now, consider the Border collie. They follow herds. They stay on the fringes and watch for stragglers. They stalk and hold their head and tail low. They sprint with great speed. They will split up and work strategies together at times. They will work to get in front of their “game” because it is less work and more effective than chasing them at times. They work silently for the most part. They use eyes ears and nose in finding and controlling their “game” (sheep, cattle). They are known to be extremely intelligent.
Now consider the European Fox hound. They use their nose almost exclusively to follow the scent trail of their game. They give voice almost constantly while they hunt. They always chase their game and never try to get in front of it. They will happily chase their game all day with no regard for the convenience or effectiveness of the method. They give no appearance of strategizing with another dog. They would never stalk their game. They rarely use their eyes or ears in finding their game. They are not highly rated in the canine world for extreme intelligence. Many strains of foxhound would loose interest in the fox if they actually caught up with it or if it went in a hole. This was by design. These dogs were bred for the chase and to be followed by nobility on horseback. It took hours of work to prepare for a hunt. They did not want the dogs to quickly catch the fox. For some, the preference was that they not catch the fox at all.
Now I ask, between the Border collie and the Fox hound, which is of the more highly refined breeding? Which probably took longer to develop? Which probably had an unlimited amount of money poured into the development? For all three questions, my best guess is that it was the fox hound. They were developed by and for kings and nobility. Hundreds of years of unlimited funds and full time staff went into working on this. Working on what? Now I am not an expert on this subject. I am depending on a book about it. But it absolutely blew me away when I realized something for the first time. The fox hound was developed to NOT catch foxes. Dogs that caught them or showed interest in baying them were eliminated from the breeding program. They spoiled a fun party is what they did. They only spoiled a big party once.
I met a sheep man named Ray Carver back near Dallas, Oregon about 1982. I would see Ray’s hounds on their boxes as I drove by his place, so one day I stopped in. They were beautifully put together tri colored hounds. They were his coyote dogs. Ray had stacks of Hunters’ Horn, and Red Ranger magazines. He showed me how that community of dog men policed each other for accuracy in breeding records. Every cross ever made had to be published in the magazine for all to see. If there was anything fishy about it, the whole community knew it. He told me that there are many strains of foxhound in America that have accurate records going back well over one hundred years.
I will never forget what else he told me because it struck me as very strange, since I am from the Ketchinstuf Clan. He had spent much of his life trying to find foxhounds that would actually bay a coyote and eventually kill it. He said it had been almost impossible to find, but that now he had dogs that would catch and kill a coyote. He was a sheep man. He wanted dogs that would catch and kill a sheep killing coyote.
Now after reading this book about fox hounds, it all makes sense. There were hundreds of years that went in to developing dogs whose lives depended on the fact that they not catch anything. Now, in relatively short time, a relatively few people with a relatively small amount of money have tried to undo all that history. These few have been trying to put together some fox hounds that want to catch something.
Consider this also: People are still breeding for coyote dogs that do not catch coyote. I have visited a couple coyote running pens and this is what I learned: dogs that catch a coyote are banned from the pen, and they are banned from competition. And those who enjoy competing in pens are going to exclude that dog from their breeding program. And beyond that, if a dog is intelligent enough to realize the coyote is circling and cuts to where the coyote will soon be, he is disqualified. So dogs that show an ability to catch are eliminated from the breeding program. And dogs that show ability to reason and solve problems are eliminated from the breeding program.
Now, consider this: there are seven breeds of UKC coonhound. Of those seven, five of them are, at their foundation, foxhound breeds. The remaining two breeds have strains that are heavily infused with the same foxhound based blood.
Next, consider this: most dogs being used to catch bobcat are either directly based in Americas’ foxhound/coyote hound breeds, or directly based in Americas’ coonhound breeds. In either case, they are founded in dogs that were originally bred to not catch anything. Now a small group of people have worked very hard to turn these dogs into catching, baying and killing dogs. But they are fighting a long and powerful genetic history.
Now, I ask you this: is it any wonder that bobcat races last for hours and often end in nothing being caught? These type dogs are used to catch raccoon, bear, lion, and bobcat. Of those species, which one gives the most fox like race? Bobcats do. But in some ways a bobcat race is more difficult for the dogs. The bobcats are harder to stay with because of less scent, because of their meandering, often confusing habits, and because of a tendency to hide on the ground or in elevated places. So these dogs have made it back to their roots of chasing something all day and not catching it.
I have no experience fox or coyote hunting. But I have hunted good coon hounds that had no intention of catching a raccoon on the ground. And they rarely, if ever, did. If something climbed a tree, they would bark at the base of the tree. But they never caught anything on the ground. About 98% of the raccoons I have hunted were not very fast. Some of them, I could run down in a foot race across an open field. I have done it. Yet, these dogs never caught one on the ground. Why? Well I am guessing it is because they did not want to. They were originally bred to not catch anything. Those hundreds of years of royal foxhound breeding at their core, still hold them irresistibly locked in this trailing/non-catching trait.
There are not a lot of dogs that have been bred exclusively for bobcat. But for those who are attempting to do this, I feel an understanding of the principle explained above is vital. This is especially true for those breeding dogs for areas where the bobcats do not readily climb trees.
I don’t pretend to know the exact history of the animal we call man’s best friend. But I do know there are some wild canines that can cross breed with the domestic dog. So let’s say that man took wild canines and began to selectively breed them to make them more useful and better companions. It is known that if the most docile and friendly foxes at a fox farm are selected from litters and bred to each other, it is only a couple generations before their ears start to droop. So it is not a hard job for the imagination to do the same with the wolf or other wild canine.
Consider the Wolf in the far North. They follow herds. They stay on the fringes and watch for stragglers. They stalk and hold their head and tail low. They sprint with great speed. They will split up and work strategies together at times. They will work to get in front of their game because that is less work and more effective than chasing them at times. They work silently for the most part. They use eyes, ears and nose in finding and controlling their game. They are known to be extremely intelligent.
Now, consider the Border collie. They follow herds. They stay on the fringes and watch for stragglers. They stalk and hold their head and tail low. They sprint with great speed. They will split up and work strategies together at times. They will work to get in front of their “game” because it is less work and more effective than chasing them at times. They work silently for the most part. They use eyes ears and nose in finding and controlling their “game” (sheep, cattle). They are known to be extremely intelligent.
Now consider the European Fox hound. They use their nose almost exclusively to follow the scent trail of their game. They give voice almost constantly while they hunt. They always chase their game and never try to get in front of it. They will happily chase their game all day with no regard for the convenience or effectiveness of the method. They give no appearance of strategizing with another dog. They would never stalk their game. They rarely use their eyes or ears in finding their game. They are not highly rated in the canine world for extreme intelligence. Many strains of foxhound would loose interest in the fox if they actually caught up with it or if it went in a hole. This was by design. These dogs were bred for the chase and to be followed by nobility on horseback. It took hours of work to prepare for a hunt. They did not want the dogs to quickly catch the fox. For some, the preference was that they not catch the fox at all.
Now I ask, between the Border collie and the Fox hound, which is of the more highly refined breeding? Which probably took longer to develop? Which probably had an unlimited amount of money poured into the development? For all three questions, my best guess is that it was the fox hound. They were developed by and for kings and nobility. Hundreds of years of unlimited funds and full time staff went into working on this. Working on what? Now I am not an expert on this subject. I am depending on a book about it. But it absolutely blew me away when I realized something for the first time. The fox hound was developed to NOT catch foxes. Dogs that caught them or showed interest in baying them were eliminated from the breeding program. They spoiled a fun party is what they did. They only spoiled a big party once.
I met a sheep man named Ray Carver back near Dallas, Oregon about 1982. I would see Ray’s hounds on their boxes as I drove by his place, so one day I stopped in. They were beautifully put together tri colored hounds. They were his coyote dogs. Ray had stacks of Hunters’ Horn, and Red Ranger magazines. He showed me how that community of dog men policed each other for accuracy in breeding records. Every cross ever made had to be published in the magazine for all to see. If there was anything fishy about it, the whole community knew it. He told me that there are many strains of foxhound in America that have accurate records going back well over one hundred years.
I will never forget what else he told me because it struck me as very strange, since I am from the Ketchinstuf Clan. He had spent much of his life trying to find foxhounds that would actually bay a coyote and eventually kill it. He said it had been almost impossible to find, but that now he had dogs that would catch and kill a coyote. He was a sheep man. He wanted dogs that would catch and kill a sheep killing coyote.
Now after reading this book about fox hounds, it all makes sense. There were hundreds of years that went in to developing dogs whose lives depended on the fact that they not catch anything. Now, in relatively short time, a relatively few people with a relatively small amount of money have tried to undo all that history. These few have been trying to put together some fox hounds that want to catch something.
Consider this also: People are still breeding for coyote dogs that do not catch coyote. I have visited a couple coyote running pens and this is what I learned: dogs that catch a coyote are banned from the pen, and they are banned from competition. And those who enjoy competing in pens are going to exclude that dog from their breeding program. And beyond that, if a dog is intelligent enough to realize the coyote is circling and cuts to where the coyote will soon be, he is disqualified. So dogs that show an ability to catch are eliminated from the breeding program. And dogs that show ability to reason and solve problems are eliminated from the breeding program.
Now, consider this: there are seven breeds of UKC coonhound. Of those seven, five of them are, at their foundation, foxhound breeds. The remaining two breeds have strains that are heavily infused with the same foxhound based blood.
Next, consider this: most dogs being used to catch bobcat are either directly based in Americas’ foxhound/coyote hound breeds, or directly based in Americas’ coonhound breeds. In either case, they are founded in dogs that were originally bred to not catch anything. Now a small group of people have worked very hard to turn these dogs into catching, baying and killing dogs. But they are fighting a long and powerful genetic history.
Now, I ask you this: is it any wonder that bobcat races last for hours and often end in nothing being caught? These type dogs are used to catch raccoon, bear, lion, and bobcat. Of those species, which one gives the most fox like race? Bobcats do. But in some ways a bobcat race is more difficult for the dogs. The bobcats are harder to stay with because of less scent, because of their meandering, often confusing habits, and because of a tendency to hide on the ground or in elevated places. So these dogs have made it back to their roots of chasing something all day and not catching it.
I have no experience fox or coyote hunting. But I have hunted good coon hounds that had no intention of catching a raccoon on the ground. And they rarely, if ever, did. If something climbed a tree, they would bark at the base of the tree. But they never caught anything on the ground. About 98% of the raccoons I have hunted were not very fast. Some of them, I could run down in a foot race across an open field. I have done it. Yet, these dogs never caught one on the ground. Why? Well I am guessing it is because they did not want to. They were originally bred to not catch anything. Those hundreds of years of royal foxhound breeding at their core, still hold them irresistibly locked in this trailing/non-catching trait.
There are not a lot of dogs that have been bred exclusively for bobcat. But for those who are attempting to do this, I feel an understanding of the principle explained above is vital. This is especially true for those breeding dogs for areas where the bobcats do not readily climb trees.