Page 1 of 1
OBAMA
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:04 pm
by wablkandtan
ONE
BAD
ASS
MISTAKE
AMERICA
Nice new bumber sticker
Re: OBAMA
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:29 pm
by liontracker
Re: OBAMA
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:43 pm
by Big N' Blue
Where do you get all this Texas Grafitti!! LOL
Re: OBAMA
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:00 pm
by liontracker
I hijacked and plagerized it from an anonymous Texan conservative!
Re: OBAMA
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 3:55 am
by houndcrazyfool
P.O.S!!! the end
Re: OBAMA
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:58 pm
by liontracker
Canadian insight into the Obama Thing. What is astounding is that it comes from Canada, a, so far, more left Country than the U.S.
Obama’s White House is Falling Down
By Daniel Greenfield
In the sixth month of his presidency, Obama has turned an economic downturn into an economic disaster, taking over and trashing entire companies, and driving the nation deep into deficit spending expected to pass 10 trillion dollars.
Abroad, Obama seems to have no other mode except to continue on with his endless campaign, confusing speechmaking with diplomacy. It is natural enough that Obama, who built his entire campaign on high profile public speeches reported on by an adoring press, understands how to do nothing else but that.
Ego driven photo op appearances and clueless treatment of foreign dignitaries
While the press is still chewing over Obama’s Cairo speech, this celebrity style coverage ignores the fact that Obama’s endless world tour is not actually accomplishing anything. Instead his combination of ego driven photo op appearances and clueless treatment of foreign dignitaries have alienated many of America ’s traditional allies. Those who aren’t being quietly angry at Obama, like Brown, Merkel or Netanyahu, instead think of him as as absurdly lightweight, as Sarkozy, King Abdullah or Putin do.
While his officials carry out their dirty economic deeds, Obama responds to any and every crisis as if it were a Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland musical, with a cry of, “Let’s put on a show.” Thus far Obama has put on “shows” across America , Europe and the Middle East . And what the adoring media coverage neglects to cover, is that Obama’s shows have solved absolutely nothing. They have served only as high profile entertainment.
Neither alienating America ’s traditional allies, through a combination of arrogant bullying and ignorance, nor appeasing America ’s enemies, has yielded any actual results. Nor does it seem likely to. Islamic terrorism is not going anywhere, neither are the nuclear threats from North Korea and Iran . While Obama keeps smiling, the global situation keeps growing more grim.
At home, if Obama was elected as depression era entertainment, the charm of his smiles and his constant appearances on magazine covers appear to be wearing thin on the American public. Despite the shrill attacks on Rush Limbaugh or the Republican Enemy of the Weak-- the Democratic party of 2009, is polling a lot like the Republican party of 2008. The Democrats have suddenly become the incumbents, and the only accomplishment they can point to is lavish deficit spending, often on behalf of the very same corporations and causes they once postured against.
The European Union Parliament’s swing to the right cannot be credited to Obama, though doubtlessly some European voters seeing socialist economic crisis management on display in the world’s richest country decided they wanted none of it, but it is part of a general turning against federalism. And Obama’s entire program is dependent on heavily entrenching federalism at the expense of individual and state’s rights. Yet that is precisely his Achilles heel with independent voters who are polling against more taxes and expanded government. And no amount of speeches by Obama can wish away his 18 czars or the national debt he has foisted on generation after generation of the American people. That leaves Obama with a choice between socialism and the independent voter. And thus far he has chosen socialism.
Obama’s tactic of hijacking Bush Administration era policies on the economy and the War on Terror, and exploiting them as Trojan horses to promote his own agenda, have left him coping with a backlash from his own party, as well as general Republican opposition.
His Czars are meant to function as the bones in an executive infrastructure accountable to no one, but a lack of accountability isn’t just another word for tyranny, but for incompetence. A functional chain of command is accountable at multiple levels if it is to function effectively. Obama’s White House by contrast is in a state of over-organized chaos, the sort of organized disorganization that undisciplined egotistical leftists naturally create for themselves, complete with multiple overlapping levels of authority and no one in charge but the man at the top, who’s too busy doing other things to actually be in charge.
Dennis Blair as National Intelligence, who collaborated with the Muslim genocide of Christians in East Timor, trying to muscle out the CIA to create his own intelligence network, is typical of the kind of chaos being spawned by every chief in an expanding government bureaucracy working to make sure that all the Indians answer to him. Similarly the National Security Council wrestling with the State Department, highlighted by Samantha Power getting her own specially created NSC position to butt heads with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, illustrates the state of conflict and chaos in American foreign affairs. A state of chaos so pervasive that incompetence has now become commonplace, and no one can even be found to double check the spelling of a Russian word that is meant to be the theme of American’s diplomatic reconstruction with Russia, or to pick out a gift for the visiting British Prime Minister.
Meanwhile on the economy, Obama exploited the ongoing bailouts, transforming them from bailouts into takeovers meant to shift the balance of power in what had been a democracy and socially engineer not only corporations, but the lives of ordinary Americans. But the public’s patience with corporate bailouts is at an end, most Americans were never happy with them to begin with, and want them to end. The death of Chrysler at the hands of Fiat and the UAW might look like a victory in the union ranks, but it doesn’t play too well outside Detroit .. And tacking on CAFE standards that will kill the pickup truck and the SUV will badly erode Obama in the swing states, if exploited properly in 2010 and 2012.. Despite the constant media barrage, orchestrated out of the White House, the public is growing disenchanted with the performance of Obama and the Democrats.
With unemployment booming and the economy dropping, the jobs aren’t there and the spending is out of control. Republicans today are polling better on ethics and the economy, than the Democrats are. That shows a trend which is likely to register in the mid-term elections in 2010, in the same way that the EU parliamentary elections served as a shock to the system.
In the opposition, Republicans are free to embrace the rhetoric of change, to champion reform and push libertarian ideas about the size and scope of government. In turn all Obama has is his celebrity fueled media spectacle world tour. A charade now serving as a parallel to the depression era entertainment that functioned as escapism in a dour time. But before long, it may be Obama that the American public will want to escape from.
Obama has tried to play Lincoln, Reagan, JFK and FDR-- but in the end he can only play himself, a shallow, manipulative and egotistical amateur who is in over his head, and trying to drag the country down with him. Obama’s White House is falling down and while the flashbulbs are still glittering and the parties are going on in D.C. and around the world, Obama and the Democratic Congress may be headed for a recession of their own.
Re: OBAMA
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:32 pm
by Big N' Blue
houndcrazyfool just curious what does P.O.S. the end mean?
Re: OBAMA
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:05 pm
by bob baldwin jr
LionTracker: Excellent post you put forward here. As much as I DESPISE the man you have to give him credit for controlling the media and his use of the internet.If you all look back on his campaign and compared to where we are at today I would call him a TOTAL FAILURE. or at best a CHRONIC HABITUAL LIAR. Do you realize that due to his Govmint EXPANSION policies that 1/6 of our GNP is now owned , controlled and administered by the govmint.You may not realize how large a number that really is .Think about it for a minute. And what is up with all these CZARS? Little by little bit by bit we are losing our freedoms at a slow but steady clip.You younger guys may not see this coming .But us older guys and those that have served like myself see this as absolutely terrifying.
losing one freedom at a time is how they do it . Inserting a bill here or there to be added to another bill is how we arrived at this point . If you think we have plenty to worry about with the ANTI's You ain't seen nothing yet compared to what is coming down the highway

As much as we love our FREEDOMS we are losing them. It has been said a lot that we should write our congress -people telling them THEY are OUR employees and at the next election cycle they very well may get FIRED. Please Please take the time ,even if you write 1 letter only tell these LIBERAL/ Socialist Types that there time is limited . Sorry I can not say it any better , But do you want to oneday tell you kids and Grandkids the story about how you had all these freedoms and great hounding adventures until OBAMMY and his liberal co-horts took them away???/
Re: OBAMA
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:31 pm
by Big N' Blue
Well said Mr. Baldwin!
Re: OBAMA
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:06 pm
by bob baldwin jr
Right back at you

Thank-you SIR