Well put George, you just failed to point out she was your "weakest link" though you do clarify why, and each owner may chose the reasons. And I think the reason why is the two terms dont tie together nicely with young up and comers. Older dogs are far more able to share both terms as by an older age they can have offered their genetic makeup (via breeding) and training service (to younger upstarts) as well as just the years of hunting service and enjoyment an older dog has given.
You or anyone says they are selling an "older" awesome dog that is your "weakest link" and I get the definition, as the age is the weakness factor for culling/selling off what can otherwise be a very useful dog for the guy that needs a trainer or that bloodline or just a solid old dog to hunt out for its last couple years.
I just struggle with the owner culling a dog applying a sales stamp that says "awesome" on one side but "weakest link" on the flip side being attached to any neutered young unfinished dogs with faults the current owner will not tolerate that has it whole hunting/breeding career in front of it. Like I said, the next guy may not have issue with the faults or need breeding potential, so for him I guess awesome may fit in his own mind but he better clarify that he judges on a score card missing half the catagories!
Houndsmen young or old, experienced or beginner should be right thrilled to have a young dog that deserves the title of "awesome" applied to him. We are all striving for that awesome young dog, let the titles definition mean what it should for those young hopeful prodigys that come through our kennels.
Who ever said cull was a bad word to start with, just is what it is. (someone will look it up in a dictionary, houndsmen version or otherwise)
Nuff said by me on this I'm out.

amongst yourselves onward if you like.
PS: I dont outfit for trouts, I cant even catch one of those slippery things
