Quick Track vs Marshall

Post your product review or ask questions on products

Post Reply
User avatar
007pennpal
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 652
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:01 am
Location: Oregon, California, Idaho, Utah, Nevada, Montana, Indiana, Ohio, BC
Location: North America

Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by 007pennpal »

Ok boys what is the one to have and why?
Sean
Seargent Michael's Kennel
Sgt. Michael's Kennel
Lead The Way
503-510-2910
seancmichael@aol.com
Image
cobalt
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:24 pm
Location: SW Id.

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by cobalt »

If $ is not a concern, Marshall is probably the highest quality telemetry system on the market.
doghunter
Tight Mouth
Tight Mouth
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:37 am
Location: Florida
Location: Florida

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by doghunter »

chek out this link it should help viewtopic.php?f=20&t=14182

I use to use only quick track but i got tired of sending mine back to charge. I think the range is about the same.
wanchese
Tight Mouth
Tight Mouth
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:45 am
Location: nc

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by wanchese »

we use wildlife box and johnson collars. even the guys that hunt with us that use quick track boxes and tracker maximas use johnson collars. i hear a lot of guys say that marshall boxes are good, but i have never used one.
Jeff Eberle
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 724
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:35 pm
Facebook ID: 0
Location: Ione Ca.(209)

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by Jeff Eberle »

Box or Collar?
Get JESUS In Your Life & Your Dog's In The Wood's

CLAVEY RIVER CUR'S
doghunter
Tight Mouth
Tight Mouth
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:37 am
Location: Florida
Location: Florida

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by doghunter »

cobalt wrote:If $ is not a concern, Marshall is probably the highest quality telemetry system on the market.
i just priced marshall to Quicktrack (both directly form the company) and Quick track was the most expencive.

I used Quick track for years ( I also own Johnson and Wildlife and the people i hunt with use many other collar brands) when the dog is a long way off the only one i found i could depend on was Quick Track. the only reason I am changing is because you have to send them back to get the collars recharged.

my old collars i use to send back every three years or longer but now i am sending them back twice a year. so that is the reason i am changeing. if you talk to Quick track they say nothing has changed but if you hunt very much and are using one of their new collars you will find out they dont last as long as they use to.

but again the range is still the best in my opinion.

anyone wanting to buy some Quick Track mine are for sale most in the 216.400 range
Hunter
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 299
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: TN
Location: over yonder

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by Hunter »

I've never owned a Quick Track collar but, I got 2 Marshall collars with a system I bought and they were so strong that they bled over on my brand new Johnson collars. Where I was picking them up on a 6 with my Johnsons I would get the other two of a 4 with the Marshalls. I really liked the collars. The light deal was cool but, I hate AA or rechargeable batteries. I know to many guys that have lost dogs with those collars on. I also know that a TON of people swear by them. I would get a Marshall if I didn't mind the batteries and that's not even knowing what a Quick Track will do.
User avatar
007pennpal
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 652
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:01 am
Location: Oregon, California, Idaho, Utah, Nevada, Montana, Indiana, Ohio, BC
Location: North America

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by 007pennpal »

both collars and box I need info on both
Sgt. Michael's Kennel
Lead The Way
503-510-2910
seancmichael@aol.com
Image
User avatar
007pennpal
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 652
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:01 am
Location: Oregon, California, Idaho, Utah, Nevada, Montana, Indiana, Ohio, BC
Location: North America

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by 007pennpal »

So, the marshall collars use AA bats? Quick track use what then? And what do you send back to be recharged? The bats or the settings? Also, how do you pick what setting you want? 216.00 etc?
Sgt. Michael's Kennel
Lead The Way
503-510-2910
seancmichael@aol.com
Image
Hunter
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 299
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: TN
Location: over yonder

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by Hunter »

I believe that you send the collars back to get the Freq. changed. You don't have to do anything with Marshall batteries. You just pop in 2 more fresh AAs and go on. If you wanted to save money just buy a AA charger and 4 batteries from walmart. The wife got one for my D batteries that goes in my Mag lite since they are so expensive. I have no idea what kind of battery goes in the Quick Tracks.
User avatar
007pennpal
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 652
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:01 am
Location: Oregon, California, Idaho, Utah, Nevada, Montana, Indiana, Ohio, BC
Location: North America

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by 007pennpal »

Why does it matter what freq. you hunt?
Sgt. Michael's Kennel
Lead The Way
503-510-2910
seancmichael@aol.com
Image
Hunter
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 299
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: TN
Location: over yonder

Re: Quick Track vs Marshall

Post by Hunter »

it doesn't really. I hunt on a 217 freq and I have friends that hunt on a 216. If you have a box like a Maxima 5000 you got everything from 216-220 and anything in those will work. It's good if you run across a good deal on a bunch of off freq collars. If your box is only programmed for a 216 you can't use anything but a 216 freq. Some are even tighter than that. Like a 216.100-216.500 and nothing outside that range will work.
Post Reply

Return to “Equipment and Product Review”