Californians CAN VOTE OUT ANTI - PET LEGISLATORS!!!

[Plott Proud]

Critical. Please read now, before you go to the poles. Thank you
Art and Dana Spencer

PLEASE CROSS POST
>
> As luck would have it, California will have an opportunity on Tuesday
> February 5 to help rid the state legislature of some of the worst
> proponents of anti-dog and anti-cat legislation. It is not just
> constituents in their legislative districts who can vote these extremists
> out. Every registered California voter has the opportunity to vote them
> out.
>
> Now is a critical time for those who oppose the radical Animal Rights
> agenda to make it clear to politicians that we are a powerful
constituency,
> and that legislators who pander to the extremist AR agenda will lose
their
> jobs. We can send letters and faxes to make our case, but what matters
> most is how we vote.
>
> A NO vote on Proposition 93 is a vote to make sure Lloyd Levine terms out
> at the end of 2008. Levine is the sponsor of the infamous AB 1634
> mandatory spay/neuter bill.
>
> A NO vote on Proposition 93 is a vote to make sure Fabian Núñez terms out
> at the end of 2008. Núñez is the Speaker of the Assembly. Had Núñez not
> twisted arms before the "do over" vote in the Assembly, AB 1634 would
have
> died for good last Spring.
>
> A NO vote on Proposition 93 is a vote to make sure Loni Hancock terms out
> at the end of 2008. Hancock sponsored a failed bill to ban the several
> thousand year old tradition of field coursing with hounds.
>
> A poll a few days ago showed Proposition 93 in a statistical
> tie. Californians are waking up to the fact that Proposition 93 is
> bad. Polls a few months ago had shown overwhelming support for it. But
> the more Californians learn about Prop 93, the less support it has.
>
> We only have two days remaining to spread the word.
>
> If every Californian dedicated to preserving our rights as dog and cat
> owners votes NO on Proposition 93 on February 5, and spreads the word to
> others to do the same, that could be the decisive factor.
>
> There are plenty of other good reasons to vote NO on Proposition 93:
> - it is dishonestly worded to make it sound like it toughens California's
> term limits, when in reality it weakens them
> - the leadership that is promoting Proposition 93 promised it would be
> paired with reform of California's corrupt and broken redistricting
> process, but they broke that promise
> - it has a sweetheart clause that allows even longer terms for Núñez and
> many others
> - newspapers on the left and the right oppose Proposition 93
> http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib ... ottom.html
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... 6UF359.DTL
>
> Laura Sanborn
> http://saveourdogs.net/
>

[Plott Proud]

CALIFORNIAN'S TOLD THE LEGISLATORS THAT THEY DON'T WANT ANY MORE LIFE LONG POLITICIANS!!

We Said NO To Ending Term Limits!!

ALL ACROSS THIS COUNTRY, BE SURE YOU GET OUT AND VOTE IN YOUR STATES PRIMARY WHEN IT COMES UP. THEN FOR SURE IN NOVEMBER!!

Take it easy!