Governments role in Sport Hunting/Trapping

[Bluetickhounddog]

.

[Old dog]

bluetick,,,, I kinda sorta get the drift of you're thoughts. but dude you are too far out there on this one.no offense intended. what I came up with is reading this stuff is like watching a horror flick? to me ,its not just hunting but the whole concept of the good ole U.S.A has gone down the toilet and that is like a horror flick in my mind. so this is how I can kinda,sorta relate. jmo

[Bluetickhounddog]

.

[Bluetickhounddog]

.

[Old dog]

no bluetic, I am not asking you anything. but you refer a horror movie on a hound forum and I was just trying to wrap my head around the correlation is all.as for watching the movie, we have the grandson living with us and we try to keep a handle on the shit he sees on the tv. so no I haven't watched it and I was probably hunting my young dogs when it was on.

[Bluetickhounddog]

.

[Old dog]

I see. as far as trying to be a tough guy?? I guess I am kinda tough for a old guy but wasn't trying to go there with you. so now I am informed about the movie but what does it have in common with this thread? governments role in sport hunting/trapping?? now I am totally confused

[Grzyadms4x4]

It's your friend from the cage under an alias. Use your original screen name Bluetick hound. Don't be a pansie ass. You opened the can of worms with him. Either go away or go back to your argument in the CAGE. Dumbass. The movie has jack to do with the topic.

[Varminator]

People are like snow flakes, there's not two alike!! Checking stomach contents was and is used to see what the "Animal" we were paid to control was feeding on.
The animal is Dead when this is done so there isn't some sick satisfaction involved.
Like I said, some like it! And some don't.

What do you run with your Bluetick(s) ????

[Varminator]

HELLO-Hello-hello! (is that an echo?) I think BTHDog is gone? Hmmmmmm!!!!

Hope the Bugerman didn't get 'em ?? Or a Grizzly!!!

[Old dog]

nope it wasn't the boogerman,,,he was another victim of the wampus cat I bet. mike I think you can have you're tread back now

[Varminator]

I don't want the Feds or the State involved. County only!! I think we may be able to have more of a say that way???? I don't know!!
One of you come up with a plan and we'll try to mold it if need be. "I didn't say pick it apart"

[Old dog]

in my opinion, it would be a fair way for the local voters to have more control of the future of the sport of hunting and as far as that goes, the future of all issues. its been my opinion for a long time that states like cal,ore,wash, have all been controlled by the big cities. this leaves the rural part of these states at the mercy of the mind set of the often liberal voters.it don't seem fair because it isn't fair. jmo good luck this go round Oregon.

[houndsandterriers]

H AND T,
When you first started posting on BGH, didn't the members try to help you by answering your questions on your Post? Did you think we were out to run you off? Did you think that we would not defend our sport if challenged??

Then when you Posted that you were a Liberal, the defense along with anger mode came out in many of us that have lost so much.

You don't know me or me you!(Only on the web) You say that we have no class and thought we would be different! "WHY in the F#@K !!!!!would you think that" ?????? Open your ears and eyes if you do like to Hunt with Dogs like you say you do!!!

Why crazy conservatives are no different than crazy liberals. One side you have over emotional right wingers that think baby's are being murdered. On the other side you MIGHT have people that think animals are being tortured and murdered. I have narrowed the liberal crazy down to one category, VEGANS nobody else want to rob you of your hunting LIBERTY!

There is how ever a lot of crazy CONCERVITIVES that are dead set on robing other Americans of there LIBERTY. These conservatives are overly emotional and are just convinced that ABORTION is murder, just like the VEGANS are convinced hunting is murder. The two category's of people are equally CRAZY.

The Planned Parenthood Video Scandal charging instead the conservative activists who arranged to make undercover videos of clinic employees. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... ay-be-over
Just like HSUS scamming voters for money and costing you your hunting LIBERTY right wing radio lied to YOU.

A second anti-abortion activist, Sandra Merritt, was also charged,
the prosecutor said. She noted that Planned Parenthood was cleared of any wrongdoing. A new poll has confirmed what we’ve long known: the Republican drive to criminalize
abortion even for victims of rape and incest is overwhelmingly opposed by the general public

Abortion is LEGAL just like HUNTING yet people still cant except that.

74 percent said abortion should be legal in cases where the mother’s life is endangered by pregnancy, 70 percent said it should be legal when the mother’s health is
endangered, and 74 percent said it should be legal when a woman becomes pregnant as a result of rape or incest. No more than 14 percent of respondents said that abortion
should be illegal in all cases.

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN!!!!!

Presidential candidate LIEING to the public in an attempt to tug on you heart strings just like the VEGANS do. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W6G_ndFVMY

A guy shoots up planned parent hood, just like the CRAZY vegans that spray painted Walter the dentists house. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmjPAdmDWFE

There is people here that may be crazier than the EFFing VEGANS!

[pegleg]

Oh sweet hell this thread is going somewhere productive. Abortion is a personal issue and for most a abstract one. That makes it unlikely anyone is going to agree exactly. At what stage is chopping a unborn child up no different then chopping up a post delivery child? The word viable gets used a lot. At the very least abortion is the lack of personal responsibility expressed.
So at a certain stage that fetus is agreed by both sides "unlikely I agree" but is agreed not to be anymore "human" then a stray dog etc. Do we as humans have a duty to try and mitigate useless loss of life? I mean killing a animal solely so it no longer exist and throwing the entire carcass in the landfill etc. Is wasteful by definition. But then you have someone who proposes unrestricted abortions at any pre birth stage who will become unhinged and rabid in their attack of hunting a animal for food , fur or damage control. Not strong on logic.
But look at it like a form of population control abortion might merit some thought. But if the basic idea that taking a human life is wrong it becomes difficult. Now if your stance is that under certain circumstances a human life can be forfeit . what are those circumstances? In the end my personal stance is that abortion is a drastic action that had better been thought out in depth by those involved. The issue I have with it in practice is the large percentage of them are performed in a fearful reactive state by the mother and maybe father as well. Then a few years later she realizes it has had a profound impact on her in ways she hadn't been advised of or considered possible. Now you and I probably 90% of everyone in her life know nothing of it or have forgotten it. Yet she feels guilt? Regardless of your stance on the act. Its hard to argue someone would feel this way if they hadn't done something they found to be wrong given time for experience and reflection. Experience says taking a human life when you absolutely believe it was justified doesn't have this effect. Truth is its those people that have taken a life for some reason they felt some doubt about their justification in doing so who struggle with it. The other side of that is those individuals who for whatever reason see no value in a human life what so ever that feel nothing in taking a life without any justification of any kind. To say that abortion is as simple as conservative vrs liberal ideology is a very shallow view of the issue.
Another awful truth as people age , mature and gain experience their views and stance on many issues change . it is hard enough to look at minor things you may have done you no longer agree with. But the act of taking steps you may in the future see as taking the life of your own child simply because it might have been or become a inconvenience is bound to be very hard on most sane people.
I'm not absolutely apposed to abortion myself. However I believe if that option is offered it is the responsibility of those offering it to not only look at the ethics and implications of taking that action but also any effect it might have on the parents now or in the future. If there is any case where all things must be considered it is surely in taking a life or potential life as you see it. And how it might affect those involved.
Sorry for the length of this. But I believe H&T does think and probably isn't adverse to looking at things in ways that might be foreign. Being educated is much different then indoctrination.