tracking collar ?

General DiscussionForum
Post Reply
jlyman
Silent Mouth
Silent Mouth
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:42 am

tracking collar ?

Post by jlyman »

I got a question for you guys about tracking frequencies. Im looking for a collar and was wondering what the diffrence is in the diffrent frequency.


Jim
bowhunter7
Tight Mouth
Tight Mouth
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:17 pm
Facebook ID: 0
Location: Pinch, WV

Post by bowhunter7 »

There is no real difference as long as you have a box that will pick up whatever frequecy your collars posses. For example, some boxes will only pick up 217 so you have to buy 217 collars to match the box. My box will pick up anything from 216 to 221 so I can buy any frequency collar I want in that range. Around here most people use 217 and 219 so you can run into problems tracking someone else's dog if there frequency is close to your's. This happened to us last week during our early bear season. Our group was tracking three of our dogs the wrong way because another group had collars on there dogs with similar numbers. I use a few 220 collars to avoid this.

Jim
User avatar
Mr.pacojack
Babble Mouth
Babble Mouth
Posts: 1572
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:54 pm
Location: Colorado
Facebook ID: 100000463480608
Location: Craig Colorado

Post by Mr.pacojack »

I asked the same question and and the way I understand it ,there is a difference the smaller you go the stronger the signal but you or your receiver would not be able to notice it . So go with what ever freq you want
LIGHTNING RIDGE KENNELS
Walker breeding at it's best
Used to Catch Big Game
Our choice is as simple as Black and White
Devin Staker
970-756-5998
http://www.forum.workingdogsworldwide.com/
jlyman
Silent Mouth
Silent Mouth
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:42 am

Post by jlyman »

thanks guys got one more question for you all. Does it matter if you use lets say a quick trac collar and a wildlife box. Or will you get better range useing the same collar and box. Sorry for dumb questions but im new and looking for the best set up.



Jim
pete richardson
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 477
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:34 pm
Facebook ID: 0
Location: Northern VT
Contact:

Post by pete richardson »

--as long as colar frequency matches reciever

-- you can mix brands-



some recievers only pick up a few frequencies--

for instance i have a mn 10 217.000 ---217 .100

217.110 -isnt going to work


some skip frequencies

ie --217.100 - .110
120 - 130
`140 - `150

so a 115 or 135 will not work ---



some will pick up whole band 217.000- ----217.999
use any 217 collar like a trx 1000

some several bands

like 216.000 thru ---220.000


i use an alinco djx10 scanner-

- works on ANY collar -need antenna to match frequency -

i dont really reccomend a scanner --more complicated- i do ok with it-- sometimes want to smash it -- lol







ive heard---marshall collar has best range--ive never used one-



for a lot of years seemed like myself and everybody i knew was using johnson collars and wildlife reciever -
when the tailgate drops
User avatar
kdrchuck
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 237
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:02 pm
Facebook ID: 0
Location: Charleston, WV

Post by kdrchuck »

We use a few different collars and recivers and they all are compatible. Sometimes it seems that one brand reciever works better. collar brands have different strengths. It seems like my quicktrack collar "tunes in" easier with my quicktrack box, but you can track any collar with any box of the same frequency.
Post Reply

Return to “General Forum”